Be not righteous over much; neither make thyself over wise: why
shouldest thou destroy thyself?”
Ecc 7:16
Ecc 7:16
I hate to begin a blog post with caveats (because I’m a
get-to-the-point kind of guy), but I think it’s important to say a few words
before jumping into something as monumental as what my blog title promises.
- Despite how it may sound from reading the title, I have nothing against our generally-beardless baptistic brothers. What I want to do in this post is make an observation about their theology, not about them as people. People are often (by the grace of God) much better than their theology would otherwise make them to be, and I have no interest in talking about them as individuals. So let me say first and foremost that Baptists are wonderful people and we ought to have more of them, while Baptist theology is bad and we ought to have less of it.
- There are pure forms of Baptist theology which leads to a more strict adherence, and impure forms which... well its not that it encourages people to be less faithful, but let's just say it set its people on a different trajectory. Mega-churches may be baptistic, but very often they're holding to an impure or loose form of it, and my comments here won't speak to them. MacAurthur churches (led by Masters Seminary graduates) are also baptistic, but are largely exempt from these observations for different reasons. What I have in mind is a point of disagreement with the pure form of Baptist theology seen in 1689 confessional churches, and while that may rule out the great majority of Baptists at the outset, I still think it’s a very important point to make.
- I was a Reformed or Particular Baptist for a little over 10 years, and I have only recently dropped the Baptist label, with much sadness and reluctance. So when I speak about the problem of Baptist theology, I'm speaking from my own heart and the place I was not very long ago. These are the struggles of the people where I lived. I say this so you'll know I'm no theological partisan out to score points on behalf of the Truly Reformed.
There. Now that the pleasantries are concluded, let's jump right
into it: pure form Baptist theology makes its adherents overly righteous, and
this is in direct violation of the warning of Ecc 7:16. It makes its people work
too hard to be holy, strive too often to be sanctified, and does not allow them
to accept that sanctification is a result of faith in Christ, not of our own
works. Real sanctification happens like flowers growing—it’s an organic abiding
that produces good fruits—while Baptist theology makes it into a cruel and
bloody struggle for goodness.
I doubt very many Baptists would say it like this. They'd say
the Bible commands us to be sanctified, to engage in the process of becoming
holy alongside Christ, and to work for what's good—which is true. But the
problem is not what's said, it's what's left unsaid. Baptists have
removed the central idea of Covenant as the foundational building block
of sanctification and put something else in its place. But because Covenant means something like family the results are not good.
What that particular thing is, varies. Sometimes it’s total
depravity. These are the churches that always pray for forgiveness as service
open, then beg God again for mercy during the shepherds prayer, unconvinced He
delights in them as His children. They know they're guilty sinners before a
holy and angry God who will by no means pardon the wrongdoer, and they keenly
feel their iniquity before Him. They understand intellectually that
they’re saved of course, and they grasp that there’s a difference between them
and those still under wrath, but there’s no substantial difference in
this, because they don’t have a deep security when it comes right down to it; covenant isn’t the lens by which they understand things, depravity is.
You’ll know this is the church’s focus because it initially sounds like refreshing faithful preaching, but after awhile begins to wear you down, similar to traveling to a high mountain. The view is great, the air is clean, but
eventually the wind picks up, the oxygen is thin, and it gets cold. The preacher
continually “preaches you into hell” (that is, tells you of your sin to convict
you of your awful state) so that he may then “preach you out of it” (that is,
urge you to humble yourself before God and renew your faith). You then begin to
doubt your salvation, but you feel guilty about being unhappy to hear another
sermon because all the pastor is calling you to do is be holy, and holiness is
a good thing, right? What’s happening to make you feel like you need to flee? The gracious covenant love of God isn’t
reigning supreme. Instead depravity is at the center, and as a consequence, the church
believes the way to holiness is to fight depravity with confession and requests
for forgiveness.
That’s not always the main idea by which sanctification
is understood either, however. Sometimes a church is overly focused on discipleship, for
instance. In such places evangelism is paramount, and the main thing is to
get people to commit to reading scripture, attend a small group, and help out
in ministry opportunities or programs. Programs exist not to move toward an
external goal, but to move the people at the church toward devotion,
commitment, good habits, and eventually, love for God. For example, an ordinary
church could buy a handful of robot vacuum cleaners and schedule the things to
run themselves to pick up the mess, but the elders instead prefer to have
people come down and vacuum manually. Why? Because good habits make for
better people. As Aslan said, "once the feet are put right the rest will
follow."
This focus isn't really wrong in and of itself either, because
it is generally true that getting people to serve the body of Christ
preps them to accept Christ, and it’s definitely true that we are to be about
the business of winning souls to Christ. But again, the chief idea which
propels life forward here is not God, it's what we can do to see people saved.
And that's a mistake.
It could be things other than depravity and devotion, I should add. It could be getting people to
feel better about themselves, or having better self-esteem. It could be community, like the ordinary non-denominal Baptist churches in your local neighborhood. It could be knowledge, like the more Liberal Baptist churches, although this one is very rare. But regardless of what the idea is in particular, it displaces the covenant
love of God from the center of life when it ought not to. We are sanctified by faith, for it is
written, "the just shall live by faith." The underpinning
of faith is the covenant love of God, which means it's not our own will power
that draws us near to Christ, but the love God has for His family, the sure
mercies He’s given to those who are unworthy. Let me say that again because
it's important. Covenant brings with it the idea of family, which in turns
strengthens the concept of God's gracious love, which naturally births humility
in us. Familial love also brings with it the assurance of knowing that
God will certainly work in us all that's necessary for our sanctification.
Lastly, beginning and ending sanctification with the idea
of covenant gives that which the Baptist sought but continues
to elude him: the strength and energy to accomplish sanctification alongside
Christ. The Covenant love of God provides the ground for understanding that our
work comes only after we've been saved. The imperatives follow the indicatives,
as it was only those who were brought out of slavery that were asked to follow
the 10 commandments, not vice versa. Those brought into the fold of God’s love
were encouraged to in turn love the Lord their God with all their heart, soul,
mind, and strength--they weren’t accepted only after becoming holy.
The chief engine of sanctification is, therefore, the faithful
loving-kindness of God. This is the keystone that holds the arch together, the
fountainhead and source of its power. And that's why raising anything else into
like prominence gets you into trouble, and why the solution is to embrace
the covenant love of God in its fullness.
No comments:
Post a Comment