And here I should add—yet—because we are now arriving at the place where we’re expected to believe a man is a woman, a dog is a cat, violent protests are peaceful, true reality is in the mind, etc. But even so, despite the fact that we’ve nearly been bludgeoned to death with the idea that reality is what we want it to be rather than what it is, Chesterton proves his point.
Lunatics are doomed not because they lack reason, but because they lack imagination. Contrary to the common popular dogma that madmen have no reason, its actually the case that madmen are quite rational, indeed, are overly rational. Their real problem is that they have no sense of wonder, but have trapped themselves a too-small prison that filters out everything else they can’t control or explain. “The madman’s explanation of a thing is always complete, and often in a purely rational sense satisfactory… his mind moves in a perfect but narrow circle… we should be chiefly concerned not so much to give him arguments as to give him air.” What’s wrong with the lunatic is not that his brain doesn’t work; it’s that his reason has dominated his sense of proportion.
This leads to the conclusion that we need to be using
goodness, not reason, to cure him. “A man cannot think himself out of a mental evil; for it is actually the
organ of thought that has become diseased, ungovernable, and, as it were,
independent. He can only be saved by will or faith.” If you’re going to
help the him you need to break into his small but orderly world with the bigness of creation. With fresh joy.
With the truth that the vast cosmos of creation is the playground and he’s not
even figured out how to use the slide yet. You must tell the man in the asylum
who believes he is god that he is, in the words of the Hulk, a “puny god.”
And Chesterton is absolutely brilliant for pointing this out.
You can’t help but read the chapter and be at once convinced that he’s put his
finger on the problem of our age and called it out appropriately. But having
said that, I want to immediately agree with its substance and yet at the same time
point out a potential mistake with it. Chesterton believes that reason or knowledge constructs the prison, while poetry and imagination tear it down. “Poets do not go mad, but chess-players do. Mathematicians go mad, and cashiers; but creative artists very seldom… the poet only asks to get his head into the heavens. It is the logician who seeks to get the heavens into his head. And it is his head that splits.” But then he goes too far with it and tries to convince us that Cowpers Calvinism drove him mad while his poetry was the cure.
Sorry brother, I’m not buying that. There are enough poets
who write crazy rambling manifestos and famous broken artists who are
imaginative but mad (Dali anyone?) that make this point invalid beyond a first
order approximation. Further, I don’t think much of the proposed cure of
mysticism as having much merit in and of itself: “Mysticism keeps men sane. As long as you have mystery you have health;
when you destroy mystery you create morbidity,” because it’s complete balderdash.
Mystery in and of itself is no cure to anything, just an admission we
don’t know something. To embrace paradox could equally mean to turn your brain
off as it could mean to stare in awe at the vastness of the universe; to
account all forms of ignorance and wonderful and valid is quite frankly a terrible
idea. A baby’s ignorance is not equivalent to an adult who spends his life stubbornly
committed to maintaining the tabula-raza.
So Chesterton does a bad job making the case that reason can put men into a prison and a not so great case that imagination can spring him from it. Nevertheless I believe he’s correctly put enough of his finger on both the problem and the cure. Imagination does fix madness. Not because imagination is the cure, but because it brings with it humility, and that undercuts the real problem of pride.
So Chesterton does a bad job making the case that reason can put men into a prison and a not so great case that imagination can spring him from it. Nevertheless I believe he’s correctly put enough of his finger on both the problem and the cure. Imagination does fix madness. Not because imagination is the cure, but because it brings with it humility, and that undercuts the real problem of pride.
It’s pride that drives the philosopher or the materialist,
or the social engineer, or lawyer (or whatever, nobody is immune) to madness. In their pride they
say, “Ah yes, I understand perfectly. I am a genius in my field. I can explain
it all” and with that they close down. The crime is not in trying to sort and
understand the data—because everyone does that all the time—the
problem is in ceasing to be a creature who does it. Children are wonderful
examples of this. They spend their time learning the basics of how things work
and trying to interact with the world to figure it out, but this learning
doesn’t drive them to madness because they know themselves to be children. Or consider the Apostle Paul. When
confronted by Festus with charge of madness he pointed out that his great learning
didn’t make him insane—and why not? Because he knew himself to be a man and
not a god. Likewise, the problem for a Calvinist is not that he believes in
predestination, the problem is his speculating about things God has prohibited us from speculating about.
The distortion comes when you swallow the knowledge in the
wrong way and it puffs you up rather than builds you up, which I believe Paul also gave a few words on. Believing yourself to be greater than you are is the point you put your arms around the world outside your mind and
say “Thus far and no more. I have arrived”, which is the point you’ve sealed yourself
off from what God wants to say to you, and teach you, and grow you into. His
revelation goes on forever, and by opposing that,
you oppose Him. So you’ve set
yourself up against God, and to fight against Him you push His system away by
retreating into your own system. Thus the world shrinks because the mind is
forced to construct a safe place to hide from God by the will which hates God. In
the end you go mad because while you believe yourself to be like God, you are not Him.
How would such a man escape such a prison? By letting go of
the pride which drove him in there in the first place. As Chesterton councils such a one, “How sad it must be
to be God… is there really no life fuller and no love more marvelous than
yours; and is it really in your small and painful pity that all flesh must put
its faith? How much happier you would be, how much more of you there would be,
if the hammer of a higher God could smash your small cosmos, scattering the
stars like spangles, and leave you in the open, free like other men to look up
as well as down!”
Awe smashes pride. Look at the size of the universe, and
then at the universe inside each drop of pond water. Look at all the wonderful books
in the nearest library which contain thousands or millions of stories. There is
great beauty in the world, and if it breaks in even for a second to impose its
colossal size upon the man his madness is cured. So to keep out God the nonbeliever
has set about the business of rejecting the awe inspiring pleasure at every
turn lest it smash his hideaway and leave him exposed to God. This is why
devout atheism is such a bloodless and unhappy affair. As Aslan said, “Oh, Adam's son, how cleverly you defend yourself against all that might
do you good!”
Awe, imagination, the
unknown, the chance to grow, these are what spring a man from his cell. And the
way Chesterton argues that is not to tell, but to show. His words are so
delightful and brilliant, that it’s impossible not to like him. It positively makes
you want to go on to the next chapter. So we will.
Next: Chapter III – The Suicide of Thought
1 comment:
Nice. I enjoyed reading your analysis.
Post a Comment